|
| | | |
|
2005
|
Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product IngredientsAuthor: SDAClose Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product IngredientsThe consumer products industry has exposure information and screening methods that can be of value in putting high production volume (HPV) chemical hazard data into an exposure perspective and thereby facilitate prioritization of chemicals for further evaluation if appropriate. This document presents methodologies and specific consumer exposure information that can be used for screening-level risk assessments of environmental and repeated human exposures to HPV chemicals through the manufacturing and use of consumer products,mainly laundry, cleaning, and personal care products. However, the approach can be applied to other consumer products when information on how consumers use the products is available. These methodologies allow hazard information to be put into context by using exposure information to characterize risk. Screening-level risk assessments are useful for prioritizing the need for further work. The intended audience of this document is chemical risk assessors within governmental agencies, businesses, and stakeholder groups who have limited experience in the area of consumer product exposure and risk assessment, and have responsibility for prioritizing chemical safety reviews of numerous substances. This document would also be useful for assessors involved in chemical risk management work as a tool to improve the efficiency of resource utilization.
|
|
1995
|
A Human Health Risk Assessment of Boron (Boric Acid and Borax) in Drinking WaterAuthor: Murray F.J.Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyClose A Human Health Risk Assessment of Boron (Boric Acid and Borax) in Drinking WaterA human health risk assessment was conducted to derive an appropriate safe exposure level in drinking water of inorganic boron-containing compounds (boric acid and borax).
|
|
1995
|
Approaches to Human Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Cleaning ProductsAuthor: Neun, David J.Journal: Journal of Toxicology: Cutaneous and Ocular ToxicologyClose Approaches to Human Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Cleaning ProductsRisk assessment and management procedures applicable to evaluating cleaning product safety are described. The four phases of the risk assessment process described are hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. Risk management utilizes the results of a risk assessment to assist in the alleviation of risks. Determination of the potential toxicity of cleaning products occurs during the hazard identification stage using data from tests on similar compounds or experiments run specifically for the material in question. If materials are predicted to elicit effects, a dose-response assessment will identify the levels of exposure that will not initiate the effects. Exposure levels are calculated to determine the anticipated human exposure. Human exposure and the dose-response assessments are integrated to characterize the health risks, if any, due to exposure. Finally, any potential risks from the products will be mitigated so that the products can be safely used. Although this is a widely used process, risk assessment is as yet an inexact science, since it is generally not possible to assign precise numerical values of increased probability of harm. To address this issue, risk assessors use strategies that tend, at each step of the process, to overestimate risk, due to compounding of conservative assumptions often used in risk assessment. The degree to which the true risk is overestimated is unknown, and likely varies from ingredient to ingredient.
|
|
1996
|
Environmental Risk Assessment of Cleaning Product IngredientsAuthor: Sedlak, Richard I.Journal: ChemosphereClose Environmental Risk Assessment of Cleaning Product IngredientsAn Environmental Risk Assessment of a cleaning product is appropriately made by examining the formulation on an ingredient-by-ingredient basis. The examination is an iterative process that entails: 1) estimating the concentration below which each ingredient has no environmental effect, and the concentration in the environment predicted to result from the desired use of each ingredient in the product; 2) comparing these two concentrations; and 3) deciding on the basis of this comparison whether the desired use of each ingredient is clearly acceptable or clearly hazardous, or whether more testing is required in order to make such a determination. The use of an ingredient is judged environmentally acceptable if the environmental concentration of the ingredient due to all sources is lower than the no-effect level determined on the basis of an appropriately comprehensive environmental effects data base. The same approach can be used to assess minor components present in cleaning product ingredients, and compounds formed by the biological metabolism or by the chemical transformation of an ingredient as a result of product use or disposal. Broadly endorsed by the scientific community, this approach finds use in the cleaning products industry for evaluating ingredients and by government for regulating chemicals. Emphasis is placed on the application of this approach to the use and disposal of cleaning product ingredients which can enter the aquatic environment, since most cleaning products are used in water solutions that are disposed into wastewater treatment systems.
|
|
2006
|
Exposure and Prioritization - Human Screening Data and Methods for High Production Volume Chemicals in Consumer Products: Amine Oxides a Case StudyAuthor: Sanderson, Hans, Jennifer L. Counts, Kathleen L. Stanton, and Richard I. SedlakClose Exposure and Prioritization - Human Screening Data and Methods for High Production Volume Chemicals in Consumer Products: Amine Oxides a Case StudyHans Sanderson 1, Jennifer L. Counts 2, Kathleen L. Stanton 1, and Richard I. Sedlak 11The Soap and Detergent Association, Technical and International Affairs, Washington, DC, USA. 2The Procter and Gamble Company, Sharon Woods Technical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Risk Analysis Volume 26 Issue 6, Pages 1637 - 1657
|
|
2009
|
High Production Volume Chemical Amine Oxides [C8–C20] Category Environmental Risk AssessmentAuthor: Hans Sanderson, Caritas Tibazarwa, William Greggs, Donald J. Versteeg, Yutaka Kasai, Kathleen Stanton, and Richard I. SedlakJournal: Risk AnalysisClose High Production Volume Chemical Amine Oxides [C8–C20] Category Environmental Risk AssessmentAn environmental assessment of amine oxides has been conducted under the OECD SIDS High Production Volume (HPV) Program via the Global International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) Amine Oxides Consortium. Amine oxides are primarily used in conjunction with surfactants in cleaning and personal care products. Given the lack of persistence or bioaccumulation, and the low likelihood of these chemicals partitioning to soil, the focus of the environmental assessment is on the aquatic environment. In the United States, the E-FAST model is used to estimate effluent concentrations in the United States from manufacturing facilities and from municipal facilities resulting from consumer product uses. Reasonable worst-case ratios of predicted environmental concentration (PEC) to predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) range from 0.04 to 0.003, demonstrating that these chemicals are a low risk to the environment.
|
|
2009
|
Use of watershed factors to predict consumer surfactant risk, water quality, and habitat quality in the upper Trinity River, TexasAuthor: S.F. Atkinson, D.R. Johnson, B.J. Venables, J.L. Slye, J.R. Kennedy, S.D. Dyer, B.B. Price, M. Ciarlo, K. Stanton, H. Sanderson, and A. NielsenClose Use of watershed factors to predict consumer surfactant risk, water quality, and habitat quality in the upper Trinity River, TexasS.F. Atkinson a, D.R. Johnson a, 1, B.J. Venables a, J.L. Slye a, J.R. Kennedy a, S.D. Dyer b, B.B. Price b, M. Ciarlo c, K. Stanton d, H. Sanderson d and A. Nielsen eaInstitute of Applied Science, Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 310559, Denton, TX 76203-0559, United States bThe Procter and Gamble Company, Miami Valley Innovation Center, 11810 East Miami River Road, Cincinnati, OH 45253, United States cEA Engineering, EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, 15 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD 21152, United States dThe Soap and Detergent Association, 1500 K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, District of Columbia 20005, United States eSasol North America, Research and Development Department, 2201 Old Spanish Trail, Westlake LA 70669, United States Surfactants are high production volume chemicals that are used in a wide assortment of “down-the-drain” consumer products. The Trinity River (Texas) is an ideal study site for surfactants due to the high ratio of wastewater treatment plant effluent to river flow (> 95%) during late summer months. The objective of this project was to determine whether surfactant concentrations, expressed as toxic units, in-stream water quality, and aquatic habitat in the upper Trinity River could be predicted based on easily accessible watershed characteristics. Results show that GIS modeling has the potential to be a reliable and inexpensive method of predicting water and habitat quality in the upper Trinity River watershed and perhaps other highly urbanized watersheds in semi-arid regions.
|
|
2009
|
Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and AustraliaAuthor: Stanton, K., C. Tibazarwa, H. Certa, W. Greggs, D. Hillebold, L. Jovanovich, D, Woltering, and R. SedlakJournal: Integrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementClose Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and AustraliaIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management Volume 6 Issue 1, Pages 155 - 163 An environmental assessment of hydrotropes was conducted under the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Screening Information Data Sets (SIDS) for High Production Volume (HPV) Program via the Global International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) Hydrotropes Consortium. The assessment and its conclusions were presented at a meeting of the OECD member countries in Washington, DC in 2005. The SIDS Initial Assessment Report (SIAR) was accepted by the membership. Their conclusion was The chemicals in this [hydrotropes] category are of low priority for further work because of their low hazard profile.
|
|
2010
|
Consumer Product Ingredient Safety: Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product IngredientsAuthor: SDAClose Consumer Product Ingredient Safety: Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product IngredientsIn 2004, The Soap and Detergent Association (SDA) published Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product Ingredients as a guide for companies engaged in stewardship of consumer products with repeated human exposures or environmental releases, especially via down-the-drain disposal. Included in the publication were several examples based on SDA’s experience in the US EPA and OECD high production volume (HPV) chemical programs. Since the initial publication, several of the submissions for particular chemical categories sponsored by SDA have been completed and accepted by the relevant HPV chemical program, and peer-reviewed journal articles have been published for those cases. The second edition, re-titled Consumer Product Ingredient Safety: Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product Ingredients to highlight the broader applicability of the publication, contains updated information on exposure assessment methodology as well as finalized case studies and the final manuscripts of the peer-reviewed articles as appendixes.
|